The movement toward a unified legal standard gained momentum following high-profile cases, including the ongoing Pelicot trial in France and investigations into online networks exploiting unconscious victims. These incidents have exposed the limitations of existing frameworks that rely on proving force or lack of refusal. Currently, 18 member states have shifted to consent-based definitions, yet the EU’s 2024 directive on violence against women notably omitted a bloc-wide standard after objections from countries like Germany, France, and Hungary, who argued that criminal law remains a national competence.
Proponents argue that the current patchwork of laws forces victims to endure secondary victimization, as the burden of proof often shifts to their behavior rather than the perpetrator's actions. While some lawmakers warn that mandating consent could turn human interaction into a rigid, contract-like legal exercise, advocates maintain that rape is fundamentally an act of power, not a simple misunderstanding. With the European Parliament now urging the Commission to revisit the issue, the debate is set to continue as part of a broader evaluation of the EU's compliance with the Istanbul Convention.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!